|
KMID : 1022420190110020015
|
|
Phonetics and Speech Sciences
2019 Volume.11 No. 2 p.15 ~ p.21
|
|
|
Post-focus compression is not automatically transferred from Korean to L2 English
|
|
Liu Jun
Xu Yi
Lee Yong-Cheol
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Korean and English are both known to show on-focus pitch range expansion and post-focus pitch range compression (PFC). But it is not clear if this prosodic similarity would make it easy for Korean speakers to learn English focus prosody. In the present study, we conducted a production experiment using phone number strings to examine whether Korean learners of English produce a native-like focus prosody. Korean learners of English were classified into three groups (advanced, intermediate and low) according to their English proficiency and were compared to native speakers. Results show that intermediate and low groups of speakers did not increase duration, intensity, and pitch in the focus positions, nor did they compress those cues in the post-focus positions. Advanced speakers noticeably increased the acoustic cues in the focus positions to a similar extent as native speakers. However, their performance in post-focus positions was quite far from that of native speakers in terms of pitch and excursion size. These results thus demonstrate a lack of positive transfer of focus prosody from Korean to English in L2 learning, and learners may have to relearn it from scratch, which is consistent with a previous finding. More importantly, the results provide further support for the view proposed in other works that acoustic properties of PFC were not easily transferred from one language to another.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
prosodic focus, post-focus compression, L2 prosody, Korean learners of English
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|